SKU: 77871644253

Polymaker HT-PLA-GF – Glasfaserverstärktes Hochtemperatur-PLA

Sale price$26.95 Regular price$29.95
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $7.49 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 18 - Jul 23

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Polymaker HT-PLA-GF – Glasfaserverstärktes Hochtemperatur-PLAPolymaker HT PLA GF glasfaserverstrktes Hochtemperatur PLA fr technische Anwendungen Polymaker HT PLA GF ist ein glasfaserverstrktes Hochtemperatur PLA Filament, das speziell fr Anwendungen entwickelt wurde, bei denen hohe Steifigkeit, mechanische Belastbarkeit und Wrmebestndigkeit gefordert sind. Es kombiniert die einfache Verarbeitbarkeit von PLA mit den strukturellen Vorteilen einer Glasfaserverstrkung. Materialeigenschaften und Aufbau HT PLA GF

Polymaker HT-PLA-GF – glasfaserverstärktes Hochtemperatur-PLA für technische Anwendungen

Polymaker HT-PLA-GF ist ein glasfaserverstärktes Hochtemperatur-PLA-Filament, das speziell für Anwendungen entwickelt wurde, bei denen hohe Steifigkeit, mechanische Belastbarkeit und Wärmebeständigkeit gefordert sind. Es kombiniert die einfache Verarbeitbarkeit von PLA mit den strukturellen Vorteilen einer Glasfaserverstärkung.

Materialeigenschaften und Aufbau

HT-PLA-GF baut auf der Basis von HT-PLA auf und wird durch eingearbeitete Glasfasern zusätzlich verstärkt. Diese Kombination erhöht die Steifigkeit und Zähigkeit des gedruckten Bauteils gegenüber Standard-PLA oder unverstärktem HT-PLA deutlich. Das Material eignet sich für Teile, die dauerhaften mechanischen Beanspruchungen standhalten müssen.

Ein wichtiger Verarbeitungshinweis: HT-PLA-GF ist abrasiv. Die enthaltenen Glasfasern führen zu erhöhtem Düsenverschleiß. Für den Einsatz ist eine gehärtete Stahldüse oder eine Rubindüse erforderlich. Standardmäßige Messingdüsen sind für dieses Material nicht geeignet.

Wärmebeständigkeit durch Tempern

Ein zentrales Merkmal von HT-PLA-GF ist die erreichbare Wärmebeständigkeit nach dem Tempern. Durch einen Temperprozess bei 80–100 °C über 30 Minuten – empfohlen werden 100 °C – wird die Wärmeformbeständigkeit der gedruckten Teile signifikant erhöht. Ohne diesen Schritt verhält sich das Material ähnlich wie herkömmliches PLA.

Dieses Verfahren ermöglicht den Einsatz der Druckteile in Umgebungen mit erhöhten Temperaturen, beispielsweise im Motorraum, in der Nähe von Wärmequellen oder bei Außenanwendungen mit direkter Sonneneinstrahlung. Der Temperprozess ist ein notwendiger Bestandteil der Verarbeitung, wenn Hochtemperatureigenschaften gefordert sind.

Druckverhalten und Verarbeitbarkeit

Trotz der Glasfaserverstärkung lässt sich HT-PLA-GF mit vergleichsweise hohen Druckgeschwindigkeiten verarbeiten – bis zu 350 mm/s sind laut Herstellerangaben möglich. Das erleichtert die Integration in schnelle Druckprozesse ohne aufwändige Parameteranpassungen. Das Material verhält sich in der Verarbeitung stabiler als viele andere technische Filamente.

HT-PLA-GF ist in 9 Farben erhältlich. Alle Farbvarianten bieten dieselbe Wärmebeständigkeit nach dem Tempern, sodass die Farbwahl keinen Einfluss auf die mechanischen Eigenschaften hat.

Geeignete Anwendungsbereiche

  • Funktionsteile mit hoher mechanischer Belastung im Maschinenbau und Prototypenbau
  • Halterungen, Gehäuse und Strukturteile in wärmebelasteten Umgebungen
  • Außenanwendungen mit direkter Sonneneinstrahlung oder erhöhten Umgebungstemperaturen
  • Technische Bauteile, bei denen Standard-PLA oder PETG an seine Grenzen stößt
  • Druckteile im Fahrzeugbereich, z. B. Halterungen im Motorraum oder Innenraum
  • Werkzeuge, Vorrichtungen und Lehren in der Fertigung

Kompatibilität und Druckervoraussetzungen

HT-PLA-GF ist mit den meisten FDM-3D-Druckern kompatibel, die für technische Filamente ausgelegt sind. Voraussetzung ist eine gehärtete Stahl- oder Rubindüse, um Abrasion durch die Glasfasern zu vermeiden. Ein beheiztes Druckbett wird empfohlen, um Verzug zu minimieren und eine gute Haftung sicherzustellen.

Der Temperprozess nach dem Druck kann in einem handelsüblichen Backofen oder einer Temperierbox durchgeführt werden. Dabei ist darauf zu achten, dass die Teile während des Temperns formstabil gelagert werden, um Verformungen durch Eigengewicht zu vermeiden.

Unterschied zu Standard-PLA und HT-PLA

Im Vergleich zu Standard-PLA bietet HT-PLA-GF eine deutlich höhere Steifigkeit, bessere Wärmebeständigkeit nach dem Tempern und eine höhere Zähigkeit unter mechanischer Last. Gegenüber dem unverstärkten HT-PLA liefert die Glasfaserverstärkung zusätzliche strukturelle Stabilität, was HT-PLA-GF für anspruchsvollere technische Anwendungen qualifiziert, bei denen reine PLA-Materialien nicht ausreichen.

Polymaker HT-PLA-GF richtet sich an Anwender, die ein technisches Filament mit einfacher Verarbeitbarkeit, hoher Druckgeschwindigkeit und definierten mechanischen sowie thermischen Eigenschaften nach dem Tempern benötigen.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 77871644253

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 26 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
B
Verified Purchase
Brian
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
Great portable display for the price.
Size: 15.6" 1080P
This monitor works very well. I bought because I needed an extra monitor for my iPad on my work desk. But I don’t have an outlet at this desk. The iPad powers the monitor just fine, though it drains the battery pretty quickly. I ended up also buying a 20ft USB-C cable and running that to the nearest outlet to power the monitor and my iPad. I also have a little phone holder standing the display up. The quality is pretty good for the price point. Definitely not my highest quality screen. It's perfect for spreadsheets and the colors are very passable anyway.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2026
A
Verified Purchase
Andrea Elizondo
Fort Morgan, US
★★★★★ 5
Really good.
Size: 15.6" 1080P
Perfect size. Love the cover that comes with it. Easy storage and portability. Perfect to work on the move. The screen itself looks really good for the price. I connected with the type c and turn on and off as my computer does. Amazing and easy to connect. Doesn't flickers.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 2, 2026
D
Verified Purchase
D. Christensen
Boise, US
★★★★★ 4
Overall great value, for the stated purpose of being a portable monitor
Size: 15.6" 1080P
This is a review of two monitors: MNN Portable Monitor 15.6inch FHD 1080P (no model number listed) M156F01 is marked on the box Arzopa Portable Monitor, 15.6'' 1080P model number: “S1 Table” I ordered the Arzopa monitor first, as kind of an impulse buy. I was going to be traveling and wanted to take my mini Ryzen 9 PC with me, but it had no monitor. I found the Arzopa monitor had good reviews and the price was right so I ordered. Then later I discovered it was a MATTE panel. I’m not sure how I missed that earlier, but I would NOT have ordered it if I knew that it was matte. Matte finishes on monitors are supposed to be easier on eyes as the matte surface supposedly reduces glare. But in my experience, there is a problem with this feature. First, any monitor positioned properly should never have a problem with glare. For example, you don’t position a monitor facing a large window or another source of strong light. If your monitor is positioned correctly, glare should not be a possible problem to be solved. Second, the matte finish on most monitors I have seen tends to greatly distort the picture quality. Imagine you are standing outside at noon, but the area you are in is foggy. The view you have of your surroundings (through a light fog) is similar to the picture quality of any matte finish monitor. At least, in my experience. I was sitting in front of my two large (not portable) monitors, thinking about the mistake I made in ordering a matte finish portable monitor. And I realized…I was so used to using dual monitors that I would really want two monitors for travel, also. I read some reviews of the MNN monitor and someone described it as a GLOSSY panel. Perfect. I decided to order the MNN to use as my “primary” travel monitor with the Arzopa to be used as my “second” monitor for a dual monitor setup while traveling. That led to mistake number 2. They are both matte finish. When I realized this, they had both shipped. And they were delivered very quickly , both arriving on the same day. I decided to give these monitors a try, and I’m glad I did. While they are both described officially as “matte”, the picture qualify is closer to what I would expect from a true “glossy” surface computer monitor. And they both have much more than acceptable image quality. So to compare them: FEATURES: Their features are identical other than their physical controls. For adjusting these monitors, there is a difference between them, and I PREFER one over the other, as far as controls go. Arzopa has multi-function push buttons on the left to adjust settings like brightness/contrast. MNN has push-buttons and a teeny tiny joystick on the right to adjust settings like brightness/contrast. I think this is an odd design decision for a -portable- monitor. The Arzopa controls are both more intuitive and (I believe) probably more sturdy / more likely to be reliable over time. We’ll see if the tiny joystick of the MNN survives a few trips bouncing around in my checked bags. DISPLAY QUALITY I was very pleasantly surprised by the image quality of both of these monitors. I would rate them both a solid 9/10 on image quality. I’ve seen better, but only with OLED panels. Between the two if I had to pick a winner for image quality it would be the MNN. But the difference is so slight. I think they both deserve a “9”. While I can tell they are both matte (and I do not like that) the matte finish of these monitors is not as “foggy” as most matte monitors. It’s not matte enough to detract from the overall image quality, which is great. The factory settings of both monitors had the brightness (black lefel) set too high. Brightness is what controls how “black” black items will appear. If the Brightness is set too high, then something which should be color black will appear to be gray or (worse) even light gray. After I turned down the brightness a bit on both monitors, the black level of both was very satisfying. Speakers: I would never try to use speakers on a portable monitor, so I can’t comment on this. I don’t think the Arzopa even has speakers, but it doesn’t matter, as I would not use those. STAND: They have virtually identical magnetically attached pleather stands that can be used to support the monitors in vertical or horizontal orientation. The magnets on both are pretty weak. However, it should be adequate for use on a solid desk or table. You might not be happy on an airplane if you hit turbulence at all. Summary and suggestion for improvement: I would give both of these a 4-star rating on the Amazon scale. To earn a 5-star rating I would suggest: 1) Replace the magnetic stand with something that attaches to the monitor more firmly. 2) Include a USB-C cable with a right-angle connector on one end. For dual monitor use, these both have cables sticking out the left side. If you want to set them side by side, you need to keep them about 2” apart, because the cables interfere with setting them close together, like you want to. The most obvious solution would be a right-angle USB-C cable. I have ordered one. But it would cost nothing for Arzopa and MNN to include this. 3) Make the above changes without increasing the price. If you could do that, I would rate these monitors a solid 5/5. There are better monitors for sale. But for the stated purpose and price? These are close to what I would want. Very close. FINAL THOUGHT: (Which One Should I Buy?) There are many portable monitors available with plenty of options in the same relative price range. The two I am reviewing here are a couple of the most highly rated. If you are trying to choose between these two specific monitors, I would recommend you buy the Arzopa. While the MNN has slightly better image quality, they both have really good image quality. I think the design of the Arzopa is just a bit more appropriate for the stated purpose of being portable. If you are leaning toward the MNN however, I would not discourage you from buying it. If you’ve narrowed down your decision to these two specific monitors, I don’t think you can possibly choose “wrong” if you buy only one of them. They both exceeded my expectations.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 16, 2025
H
Verified Purchase
Humberto
Fort Morgan, US
★★★★★ 5
Great product
Color: Black, Size: Case for iPad (A16) 11th/10th Generation 11/10.9''
Easy to install, Really fit well, durable and look good and the customer service was really nice when I need something
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2026
N
Verified Purchase
Nikolette Scruggs
Phoenix, US
★★★★★ 5
Great case - does its job!
Color: Black, Size: Case for iPad (A16) 11th/10th Generation 11/10.9''
This is a great case for a kid (or adult) who is rough on their iPad. My kids iPad has been dropped, thrown, etc. and the case has done its job. We like having the built in screen protector which is fairly easy to clean. The case has a strap and a kickstand if needed and looks professional if that’s important to you. Worth the money!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 29, 2026

recommand products